1  Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
 2  Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 3   by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FD1C000A
 4   for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 5   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
 6  Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 7   by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5CF6F6A0
 8   for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 9   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
10  X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
11  X-Spam-Flag: NO
12  X-Spam-Score: 1.101
13  X-Spam-Level: *
14  X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
15   tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
16   DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
17   FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
18   RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
19   SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
20   autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
21  Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
22   dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
23  Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
24   by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
25   with ESMTP id Q7HFO_q02ylH
26   for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
27   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
28  X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
29  Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch (mail-40141.protonmail.ch
30   [185.70.40.141])
31   by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54B86F69F
32   for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
33   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:38 +0000 (UTC)
34  Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:28 +0000
35  DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
36   s=protonmail; t=1615954776;
37   bh=WknaPnUeW3XznxPO1I3ZHZNePlucvJOHhOYHbjWSEs0=;
38   h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
39   b=iOCq32TZSWT6oxDWF2XfNDM8zRbwIoTmZmPMxu7uEpgUsGDLEjQ5AX9qAgatE53QS
40   eXxxU15fVXUACmyZyHCPyDv6Z5rG2uOJsFNMnussSoVFwXsqLrywr4L8bQy/EyjX8X
41   UxDdJJRD9AbD7/niXqgWq8e4LG+Ldf2ImGuev4lY=
42  To: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>,
43   Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
44  From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
45  Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
46  Message-ID: <wOCt6DJ8N_0A9iJ43wTFj_4bR7DorXrB6cIGPsPBr6G_qNDP6veoDOVXnu_9wiKT2prQtbcLApzos7dSBXsaU--bv88m4xLXC8PVwpgRIvQ=@protonmail.com>
47  In-Reply-To: <93d634e2-4102-78f6-c5bc-48fd2af10666@peersm.com>
48  References: <CAFBxzAAO1u=C8wpwvRs5evE657V0NdnSE9PYAbanpJt5ZdSkdA@mail.gmail.com>
49   <3504919A-6D19-4858-B00C-9C0FEB090DB5@voskuil.org>
50   <PS2P216MB09147F068F81F31593E06A5F9D6D9@PS2P216MB0914.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
51   <93d634e2-4102-78f6-c5bc-48fd2af10666@peersm.com>
52  MIME-Version: 1.0
53  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
54  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
55  Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
56  X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
57  X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
58  Precedence: list
59  List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
60  List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
61   <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
62  List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
63  List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
64  List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
65  List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
66   <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
67  X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:19:39 -0000
68  
69  
70  > It's incredible how this troll keeps trolling and the list (bitcoin-dev !=
71  !) keeping attention
72  >
73  > Good troll, really
74  
75  Depending on topic raised, it may be useful to at least answer the troll na=
76  ively as if it were an honest question, if only so that third parties readi=
77  ng do not get confused and think the troll is bringing up some objection th=
78  at is actually relevant.
79  
80  For this particular topic you replied to, it seems to me obviously inane to=
81   discuss the "lordship" and "majesty" of the troll.
82  Even if the claims to such "lordship" are *true*, for most of the world, th=
83  e relevance of the previous British empire is little more than a reality TV=
84   show about the British royal family (oh, some random thing happened to som=
85  e random descendant of the royal family, how interesting, say did you see t=
86  hat nice new (actually old) technique Jeremy was talking about on the other=
87   thread about delegating control of coins to script, it looks like "graftro=
88  ot without a softfork"?), and any particular claims to nobility or aristocr=
89  acy are largely moot, thus not worth answering.
90  
91  
92  Regards,
93  ZmnSCPxj
94