1  Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
 2  	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
 3  	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
 4  	(envelope-from <grarpamp@gmail.com>) id 1SPrza-000270-NW
 5  	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
 6  	Thu, 03 May 2012 09:06:30 +0000
 7  Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
 8  	designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
 9  	client-ip=209.85.212.181; envelope-from=grarpamp@gmail.com;
10  	helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com; 
11  Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181])
12  	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
13  	(Exim 4.76) id 1SPrzV-0004jJ-DC
14  	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
15  	Thu, 03 May 2012 09:06:30 +0000
16  Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so114924wib.10
17  	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
18  	Thu, 03 May 2012 02:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
19  MIME-Version: 1.0
20  Received: by 10.180.105.198 with SMTP id go6mr1252856wib.19.1336035979209;
21  	Thu, 03 May 2012 02:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
22  Received: by 10.180.106.229 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 02:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
23  In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpczLTCzikGr62K-4paxecOTtcxFPygQsp7JRg_0DwvMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
24  References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
25  	<201205020931.01718.luke@dashjr.org>
26  	<CAD2Ti2_AUG7zmhwrg1GK9iDOgAh5RNrSEGvJefWCc0Uo=-GQbw@mail.gmail.com>
27  	<201205021230.46349.luke@dashjr.org>
28  	<CAD2Ti29NGc7F1_w5VgKm565CXwhrFPZvMx4BgE_5PVbh0SYU5w@mail.gmail.com>
29  	<CA+8xBpczLTCzikGr62K-4paxecOTtcxFPygQsp7JRg_0DwvMEQ@mail.gmail.com>
30  Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 05:06:19 -0400
31  Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2_AFj34yZY-7PVc66XbMahr0MwHOMk8AsHQvFncpcee6A@mail.gmail.com>
32  From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
33  To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
34  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
35  X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
36  X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
37  	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
38  	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
39  	sender-domain
40  	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
41  	(grarpamp[at]gmail.com)
42  	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
43  	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
44  	author's domain
45  	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
46  	not necessarily valid
47  	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
48  X-Headers-End: 1SPrzV-0004jJ-DC
49  Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
50  Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
51  X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
52  X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
53  Precedence: list
54  List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
55  List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
56  	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
57  List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
58  List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
59  List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
60  List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
61  	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
62  X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:06:30 -0000
63  
64  > "Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
65  > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
66  
67  Ok, ok. but only because this reminds me of the
68  top-posting and formatting advice page that
69  I can't seem to find right now.
70  
71  But I'm not munging what my client decides to
72  put in to/cc on a g reply either :)
73  
74