/ 80 / cdc195d69dcfdd852d7359ac163957d8405c30
cdc195d69dcfdd852d7359ac163957d8405c30
 1  Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
 2  	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
 3  	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
 4  	(envelope-from <sipa@ulyssis.org>) id 1QY5uj-00064r-C2
 5  	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
 6  	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:30:57 +0000
 7  X-ACL-Warn: 
 8  Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129]
 9  	helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be)
10  	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
11  	id 1QY5ui-0007M5-52 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
12  	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:30:57 +0000
13  X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: sipa@ulyssis.org
14  X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-48.798, required 5, 
15  	autolearn=disabled, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0.00,
16  	FREEMAIL_FROM 0.00, KUL_SMTPS -50.00, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 1.20)
17  X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean
18  X-KULeuven-ID: 545CD138224.A7D48
19  X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
20  Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be
21  	[134.58.240.74])
22  	by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545CD138224;
23  	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
24  Received: from smtp.ulyssis.org (mail.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.be
25  	[193.190.253.235])
26  	by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F2231E702;
27  	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
28  Received: from wop.ulyssis.org (wop.intern.ulyssis.org [192.168.0.182])
29  	by smtp.ulyssis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A688F1005D;
30  	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:31:13 +0200 (CEST)
31  Received: by wop.ulyssis.org (Postfix, from userid 615)
32  	id 3438B87C1B2; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
33  Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:30:49 +0200
34  X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster
35  From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
36  To: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
37  Message-ID: <20110619003048.GA26366@ulyssis.org>
38  References: <BANLkTi=S0_K7kftB-+driDFiXBQ6LDhSPQ@mail.gmail.com>
39  MIME-Version: 1.0
40  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
41  Content-Disposition: inline
42  In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=S0_K7kftB-+driDFiXBQ6LDhSPQ@mail.gmail.com>
43  X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
44  User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
45  X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
46  X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
47  	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
48  	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
49  	0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
50  	CUSTOM_MED 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED    ADSP custom_med hit,
51  	and not from a mailing list
52  X-Headers-End: 1QY5ui-0007M5-52
53  Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
54  Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Roadmap for autotools / Qt gui merge
55  X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
56  X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
57  Precedence: list
58  List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
59  List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
60  	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
61  List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
62  List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
63  List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
64  List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
65  	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
66  X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:30:57 -0000
67  
68  On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:42:30AM +0000, John Smith wrote:
69  > Hello,
70  > 
71  > I think my Qt GUI is pretty much ready for merging. I've been using it for a
72  > while and all functionality works.
73  > 
74  > What is the current roadmap for including the autotools build system, so
75  > that it will be possible to support multiple GUIs? 0.4.0?
76  
77  The consensus seems to be to merge autotools and qtgui. However, autotools is
78  apparently not tested (enough) on native windows and osx platforms.
79  
80  Anyone on this list with either development environnement, and willingness
81  to test?
82  
83  -- 
84  Pieter
85  
86  
87