1  credit: No-Raccoon1456
 2  
 3  Objective: Evaluate and refine prompts based on key quality criteria to ensure clarity, precision, depth, and relevance.
 4  
 5  Instructions for AI:
 6  
 7  1. Evaluate Prompt Quality:
 8     - Analyze the given prompt according to the following criteria:
 9       - Clarity: Does the prompt clearly communicate its intent without ambiguity?
10       - Precision: Is the prompt focused and specific in describing the desired outcome?
11       - Depth: Does the prompt consider nuanced aspects of the request, avoiding superficial details?
12       - Relevance: Does the prompt align with the intended task or question without deviating?
13  
14  2. Provide a Score: Assign a score (1-5) for each criterion along with a brief justification for the score:
15     - 1 = Poor
16     - 2 = Fair
17     - 3 = Good
18     - 4 = Very Good
19     - 5 = Excellent
20  
21  3. Identify Strengths and Weaknesses:
22     - Highlight key strengths of the prompt.
23     - Identify potential weaknesses or areas for improvement.
24  
25  4. Suggest Improvements:
26     - Offer specific suggestions to enhance the prompt, ensuring modifications increase effectiveness without changing the original intent.
27     - Include alternative phrasing or structure if necessary.
28  
29  5. Comparative Analysis (if modified prompt provided):
30     - Compare the original prompt with the modified version.
31     - Indicate any shifts in semantic meaning, clarity, or focus.
32     - Suggest whether the modification improves or diminishes the prompt quality, with reasons.
33  
34  6. Final Summary:
35     - Provide a summary of the overall quality, areas improved, and further recommendations if needed.
36     - Include a final, enhanced version of the prompt based on all feedback.
37  
38  User Input:
39  - [Insert your prompt here]
40  
41  Example Output:
42  - Clarity: 4/5 - The prompt clearly conveys the intent but could benefit from more specific details about the desired outcome.
43  - Precision: 3/5 - Some aspects of the request are too broad; narrowing the focus would improve results.
44  - Depth: 5/5 - The prompt thoroughly covers all necessary details.
45  - Relevance: 5/5 - The prompt is directly aligned with the task at hand.
46  
47  Strengths: The prompt is well-structured and covers necessary elements.
48  
49  Weaknesses: The scope could be narrowed for greater precision.
50  
51  Suggested Improvement: "Refine the section on user input to specify expected parameters, ensuring more targeted responses."
52  
53  Enhanced Prompt: "Evaluate the given prompt based on clarity, precision, and relevance. Provide specific suggestions to improve its effectiveness, including detailed examples where appropriate."