1  # CI Dashboard Report - Alpha/Delta Protocol
  2  **Generated:** 2026-01-24
  3  **Source:** dashboard-data.yaml (snapshot: 2026-01-20T18:13:00Z)
  4  **Metrics:** Pass/Fail, Coverage Trend, Vulnerabilities, Mutation Score
  5  **Format:** Summary
  6  
  7  ---
  8  
  9  ## Executive Summary
 10  
 11  **Status:** ⚠️ **CRITICAL - No CI Activity Detected**
 12  
 13  The CI dashboard is configured to track 22 repositories but currently has **zero active CI job history**. This 3-day-old data snapshot indicates that CI pipelines are either not configured, not triggering, or data collection infrastructure is not operational.
 14  
 15  ### Key Metrics Overview
 16  
 17  | Metric | Value | Status |
 18  |--------|-------|--------|
 19  | Total Repositories | 22 | Tracked |
 20  | Repositories with CI | 0/22 | No Data |
 21  | Overall Success Rate | 0.0% | No Data |
 22  | Total Vulnerabilities | 0 | Not Scanned |
 23  | Average Coverage | 0.0% | No Data |
 24  | Average Mutation Score | 0.0% | No Data |
 25  | Last Updated | 2026-01-20T18:13:00Z | Current |
 26  
 27  ---
 28  
 29  ## 1. Pass/Fail Metrics
 30  
 31  **Overall Status:** No test runs recorded
 32  
 33  All 22 repositories show zero CI activity:
 34  - Total Runs: 0
 35  - Passed: 0
 36  - Failed: 0
 37  - Success Rate: 0.0%
 38  
 39  ### Repository Breakdown by Category
 40  
 41  **Core Infrastructure (5 repos)**
 42  - alphavm, deltavm, alphaos, deltaos, adnet
 43  - Status: No CI runs
 44  
 45  **Core Libraries & Language (3 repos)**
 46  - acdc-core, adl, adl-examples
 47  - Status: No CI runs
 48  
 49  **Applications (5 repos)**
 50  - wallet-core, acdc-wallet, acdc-governor, acdc-messenger, acdc-scanner
 51  - Status: No CI runs
 52  
 53  **Infrastructure & Tooling (9 repos)**
 54  - ac-dc, acdc-docs, acdc-home, acdc-forge, acdc-design, acdc-i18n, ci-dashboard, alpha-delta-context, sdk, acdc-contracts
 55  - Status: No CI runs
 56  
 57  **Analysis:** CI workflows need to be triggered or configured. Verify Forgejo runners are active and repository webhooks are properly set up.
 58  
 59  ---
 60  
 61  ## 2. Coverage Trend
 62  
 63  **Current Coverage:** 0.0% (average across all repositories)
 64  
 65  **Historical Trends:** No trend data available
 66  
 67  All repositories report:
 68  - Current Coverage: 0.0%
 69  - Trend Data: Empty (no historical data points)
 70  
 71  **Analysis:** Code coverage tracking has not been implemented or no CI runs have completed with coverage reporting enabled.
 72  
 73  **Expected Coverage Tools:**
 74  - Rust repositories: `cargo-tarpaulin`, `cargo-llvm-cov`
 75  - TypeScript/JavaScript: `vitest --coverage`, `jest --coverage`, `nyc`
 76  - Python: `pytest-cov`, `coverage.py`
 77  
 78  **Next Steps:**
 79  1. Add coverage reporting steps to CI workflows
 80  2. Configure coverage thresholds in quality gates
 81  3. Set up historical tracking to monitor trends over time
 82  
 83  ---
 84  
 85  ## 3. Mutation Testing Score
 86  
 87  **Average Mutation Score:** 0.0%
 88  
 89  **Repositories Tested:** 0/22
 90  
 91  All repositories report `mutation_score: 0.0`, indicating mutation testing has not been executed or results have not been collected.
 92  
 93  **Mutation Testing Status:**
 94  
 95  Mutation testing is a critical quality metric that validates test suite effectiveness by introducing deliberate bugs (mutations) into code and verifying that tests catch them.
 96  
 97  **Expected Mutation Testing Tools:**
 98  - **Rust projects:** `cargo-mutants` (mutation testing for Rust)
 99  - **TypeScript/JavaScript:** `stryker-mutator`
100  - **Python:** `mutmut`, `cosmic-ray`
101  
102  **Mutation Score Interpretation:**
103  - **90-100%:** Excellent - Tests catch nearly all code changes
104  - **70-89%:** Good - Most mutations detected, some gaps exist
105  - **50-69%:** Fair - Significant test suite improvements needed
106  - **<50%:** Poor - Test suite has major coverage holes
107  
108  **Priority Repositories for Mutation Testing:**
109  1. **Critical Infrastructure:** alphavm, deltavm, acdc-core
110  2. **Operating Systems:** alphaos, deltaos
111  3. **Network Layer:** adnet
112  4. **Financial:** wallet-core, acdc-wallet
113  
114  **Next Steps:**
115  1. Integrate `cargo-mutants` into CI workflows for Rust repositories
116  2. Set baseline mutation score targets (≥60% for critical code)
117  3. Enable mutation testing in nightly CI runs (resource-intensive)
118  4. Track mutation score trends over time
119  5. Focus on critical paths: consensus, cryptography, transaction handling
120  
121  ---
122  
123  ## 4. Vulnerabilities
124  
125  **Total Vulnerabilities:** 0
126  
127  | Severity | Count | Impact |
128  |----------|-------|--------|
129  | Critical | 0 | No critical vulnerabilities |
130  | High | 0 | No high vulnerabilities |
131  | Medium | 0 | No medium vulnerabilities |
132  | Low | 0 | No low vulnerabilities |
133  
134  **Per-Repository Status:** All 22 repositories report zero vulnerabilities across all severity levels.
135  
136  **Security Scanning Status:**
137  
138  This result of zero vulnerabilities **does not indicate a secure codebase**. Instead, it indicates that security scanning has not been performed.
139  
140  **Expected Security Audit Tools:**
141  - **Rust projects:** `cargo audit` (checks RustSec Advisory Database)
142  - **TypeScript/JavaScript:** `npm audit`, `pnpm audit`, `yarn audit`
143  - **Python:** `pip-audit`, `safety`
144  
145  **Critical Action Required:**
146  1. Enable dependency vulnerability scanning in all CI workflows
147  2. Integrate `cargo audit` for Rust repositories
148  3. Integrate `npm audit` or equivalent for JavaScript/TypeScript repositories
149  4. Set up automated security advisories and alerts
150  5. Establish vulnerability remediation SLAs (Critical: 24h, High: 7d, Medium: 30d)
151  
152  ---
153  
154  ## Summary: Current State Assessment
155  
156  ### Overall Health: ⚠️ UNINITIALIZED
157  
158  The CI dashboard infrastructure is in place but **no metrics are being collected**. The current state represents a zero-baseline with all repositories showing:
159  
160  | Metric | Status | Risk Level |
161  |--------|--------|------------|
162  | **Pass/Fail Tracking** | No data | 🔴 High - No build status visibility |
163  | **Code Coverage** | 0.0% | 🔴 High - No quality baseline |
164  | **Vulnerability Scanning** | Not active | 🔴 Critical - Security blind spot |
165  | **Mutation Testing** | Not implemented | 🟡 Medium - Test quality unknown |
166  
167  ### Critical Gaps
168  
169  1. **No CI Execution History**: All repos show 0 runs, indicating CI is either not configured or not triggering
170  2. **No Security Posture**: Zero vulnerabilities likely means no scanning, not a secure codebase
171  3. **No Quality Metrics**: Coverage and mutation scores at 0 indicate missing quality gates
172  4. **No Trend Data**: Empty coverage trends prevent quality degradation detection
173  
174  ### Root Cause Analysis
175  
176  Possible issues preventing data collection:
177  - Forgejo runners not active or misconfigured
178  - CI workflows not present in `.forgejo/workflows/` directories
179  - Dashboard backend not querying Forgejo database
180  - Webhook triggers not firing on commits
181  - Data collection scripts not running
182  
183  ---
184  
185  ## Recommendations
186  
187  ### Immediate Actions Required
188  
189  1. **Verify CI Infrastructure**
190     - Confirm Forgejo CI runners are online and registered
191     - Check repository webhook configurations
192     - Verify `.forgejo/workflows/` directories exist in repositories
193  
194  2. **Enable Data Collection**
195     - Start CI dashboard backend service
196     - Verify Forgejo database connectivity
197     - Test API endpoints for data retrieval
198  
199  3. **Trigger Initial CI Runs**
200     - Push commits to trigger workflows across all repositories
201     - Monitor job execution and completion
202     - Validate data population in dashboard
203  
204  ### Quality Gate Implementation
205  
206  **Priority 1: Core Infrastructure**
207  Focus on critical repositories first:
208  - alphavm, deltavm (VMs)
209  - alphaos, deltaos (Operating Systems)
210  - adnet (Network)
211  - acdc-core (Core Library)
212  
213  **Minimum Quality Standards:**
214  - Test Coverage: ≥80%
215  - Vulnerability Severity: Zero critical/high
216  - Build Success Rate: ≥95%
217  - Mutation Score: ≥60% (for critical paths)
218  
219  ### Medium-Term Improvements
220  
221  1. **Automated Monitoring**
222     - Set up alerts for failed builds
223     - Configure coverage trend tracking
224     - Implement vulnerability scanning on every commit
225  
226  2. **Historical Tracking**
227     - Enable coverage trend collection
228     - Track success rate over time
229     - Monitor vulnerability introduction/resolution
230  
231  3. **Documentation**
232     - Document baseline metrics
233     - Establish improvement targets
234     - Create runbooks for CI failures
235  
236  ---
237  
238  ## Technical Notes
239  
240  **Data Sources:**
241  - Forgejo SQLite database at `/var/lib/forgejo/forgejo.db`
242  - CI runner logs via SSH (`journalctl -u forgejo-runner-*`)
243  - Radicle storage at `~/.radicle/storage/`
244  
245  **Dashboard Components:**
246  - Backend: FastAPI at source.ac-dc.network
247  - Frontend: Static HTML/JS at source.ac-dc.network/dash
248  - CI Watcher: Python log parser on CI server
249  
250  **Environment Variables:**
251  - `FORGEJO_DB_PATH`: Path to Forgejo database
252  - `CI_SERVER_HOST`: CI server IP (10.106.0.3)
253  - `CI_SERVER_USER`: SSH user for CI access
254  
255  ---
256  
257  ## Repository List
258  
259  22 repositories tracked across Alpha/Delta Protocol:
260  
261  **Core (5):** alphavm, deltavm, adnet, alphaos, deltaos
262  **Libraries (3):** acdc-core, adl, adl-examples
263  **Applications (5):** wallet-core, acdc-wallet, acdc-governor, acdc-messenger, acdc-scanner
264  **Infrastructure (9):** ac-dc, acdc-docs, acdc-home, acdc-forge, acdc-design, acdc-i18n, ci-dashboard, alpha-delta-context, sdk, acdc-contracts
265  
266  ---
267  
268  ---
269  
270  ## Action Items Summary
271  
272  ### P0 - Critical (Immediate)
273  1. **Verify CI runner fleet status** on 10.106.0.3
274  2. **Confirm Forgejo Actions configuration** across all repos
275  3. **Test dashboard data pipeline** (backend → database → frontend)
276  4. **Trigger test CI runs** to validate infrastructure
277  
278  ### P1 - High (This Week)
279  5. **Deploy quality gates** to all 22 repositories
280  6. **Enable code coverage reporting** (tarpaulin, nyc, pytest-cov)
281  7. **Activate vulnerability scanning** (cargo audit, npm audit)
282  8. **Set baseline quality thresholds** (80% coverage, 95% success rate)
283  
284  ### P2 - Medium (This Month)
285  9. **Implement mutation testing** for critical repos (VMs, wallet-core, acdc-core)
286  10. **Configure automated alerting** for CI failures and vulnerabilities
287  11. **Establish historical trending** for all metrics
288  12. **Document quality standards** and CI architecture
289  
290  ---
291  
292  **Report Status:** Analysis complete. Infrastructure initialization required before metrics become actionable.
293  **Data Freshness:** 4 days old - recommend re-generating after CI activation
294  **Next Report:** Schedule after 48h of active CI execution to establish baselines