LAUNCH_PLAYBOOK.md
1 # ARGUS-AI Launch Playbook 2 3 ## Phase 1: Repository Setup (Day 0) 4 5 ### Step 1: Push to GitHub 6 7 ```bash 8 cd argus-ai 9 git init 10 git add . 11 git commit -m "v0.1.0: G-ARVIS scoring engine, agentic metrics, threshold monitoring 12 13 - G-ARVIS composite scorer (6 dimensions: G/A/R/V/I/S) 14 - Agentic evaluation metrics: ASF, ERR, CPCS 15 - 3-line SDK: init/evaluate/score 16 - Threshold monitoring with sliding window breach detection 17 - Prometheus and OpenTelemetry exporters 18 - Drop-in Anthropic and OpenAI provider wrappers 19 - 84 unit tests, 93%+ core coverage 20 - Apache 2.0 license" 21 22 git remote add origin git@github.com:anilatambharii/argus-ai.git 23 git branch -M main 24 git push -u origin main 25 ``` 26 27 ### Step 2: GitHub Repository Settings 28 29 1. Add description: "Production-grade LLM observability in 3 lines. G-ARVIS scoring for Groundedness, Accuracy, Reliability, Variance, Inference Cost, and Safety." 30 2. Add topics: `llm`, `observability`, `ai-safety`, `mlops`, `monitoring`, `evaluation`, `production-ai`, `garvis`, `agentic-ai`, `python` 31 3. Set homepage URL: `https://argus-ai.ambharii.com` 32 4. Enable Discussions 33 5. Enable Sponsors (link to ambharii.com) 34 35 ### Step 3: Create GitHub Release 36 37 ```bash 38 git tag -a v0.1.0 -m "v0.1.0: Initial open-source release" 39 git push origin v0.1.0 40 ``` 41 42 Create release on GitHub with CHANGELOG.md content as release notes. 43 44 ### Step 4: Publish to PyPI 45 46 ```bash 47 pip install twine build 48 python -m build 49 twine upload dist/* 50 ``` 51 52 Verify: `pip install argus-ai && python -c "import argus_ai; print(argus_ai.__version__)"` 53 54 --- 55 56 ## Phase 2: Content Launch (Days 0-3) 57 58 ### Day 0: LinkedIn Newsletter 59 60 Publish Edition 4 of "Field Notes: Production AI" (see docs/linkedin-launch-edition4.md). 61 62 Pin the post. Reply to every comment within 2 hours for the first 48 hours. 63 64 ### Day 0: X/Twitter Thread 65 66 Post 1: 67 "I just open-sourced the G-ARVIS scoring engine. 68 69 pip install argus-ai 70 71 3 lines of code. Every LLM call now has a quality score across 6 dimensions. 72 73 Your LLM app is degrading right now. You just cannot see it. Thread below." 74 75 Post 2: 76 "G-ARVIS evaluates every LLM response across: 77 G - Groundedness (hallucination detection) 78 A - Accuracy (factual correctness) 79 R - Reliability (format consistency) 80 V - Variance (output stability) 81 I - Inference Cost (token efficiency) 82 S - Safety (PII, toxicity, injection) 83 84 One composite score. Sub-5ms." 85 86 Post 3: 87 "New in v0.1.0: Agentic evaluation metrics. 88 89 ASF (Agent Stability Factor) 90 ERR (Error Recovery Rate) 91 CPCS (Cost Per Completed Step) 92 93 Traditional metrics like BLEU/ROUGE were not designed for 10-step autonomous workflows. These were." 94 95 Post 4: 96 "Open core strategy: 97 98 Open source: G-ARVIS scorer, SDK, monitoring, exporters 99 Proprietary: Autonomous correction loop, self-healing pipeline 100 101 Detection is free. The fix is what you pay for. 102 103 github.com/anilatambharii/argus-ai" 104 105 ### Day 1: Hacker News 106 107 Title: "Show HN: argus-ai – G-ARVIS scoring engine for LLM observability (3 lines of code)" 108 109 Comment: 110 "Author here. I have been running LLMs in production across Fortune 100s (Duke Energy, UnitedHealth, R1 RCM) for years. The consistent pattern: apps work great at launch, then silently degrade while traditional metrics show green. 111 112 G-ARVIS scores six dimensions (Groundedness, Accuracy, Reliability, Variance, Inference Cost, Safety) in sub-5ms with zero external dependencies. Threshold monitoring with sliding window breach detection tells you when quality is trending down before it becomes an incident. 113 114 New in this release: three agentic evaluation metrics (ASF, ERR, CPCS) for autonomous workflow monitoring. Traditional metrics like BLEU/ROUGE were not built for 10-step tool-using agents. 115 116 Apache 2.0. Open core model: scoring and monitoring are free. The autonomous correction loop stays proprietary. 117 118 Happy to answer questions about the framework, production LLM observability, or the open-core strategy." 119 120 ### Day 2: Reddit 121 122 Post to r/MachineLearning (D), r/LangChain, r/LocalLLaMA. 123 124 Title: "[P] argus-ai: G-ARVIS scoring engine for production LLM observability" 125 126 ### Day 3: Medium Cross-Post 127 128 Adapt the LinkedIn newsletter into a Medium article on @anilAmbharii. Add code examples and architecture diagrams. 129 130 --- 131 132 ## Phase 3: Community Growth (Weeks 1-4) 133 134 ### Week 1: First Contributors 135 136 1. Create "good first issue" labels on 3-5 issues: 137 - "Add LiteLLM integration" 138 - "Add LangChain callback handler" 139 - "Add Datadog exporter" 140 - "Add CLI tool for batch scoring" 141 - "Improve groundedness scorer with sentence embeddings" 142 143 2. Respond to every issue and PR within 24 hours. 144 145 ### Week 2: Ecosystem Integration 146 147 1. Submit PR to awesome-llm-apps lists 148 2. Submit PR to awesome-mlops lists 149 3. Contact LiteLLM maintainers about native integration 150 4. Contact LangChain about callback handler inclusion 151 152 ### Week 3: Benchmarks and Content 153 154 1. Publish benchmark comparing argus-ai scoring speed vs alternatives 155 2. Write "How We Monitor 50M LLM Calls with G-ARVIS" case study 156 3. Create Grafana dashboard screenshot gallery (use docs/grafana-dashboard.json) 157 158 ### Week 4: CAIO Circle Presentation 159 160 Present argus-ai at CAIO Circle Tri-State Chapter meeting. Collect feedback from peer CDOs/CTOs. Use as validation signal for LinkedIn content. 161 162 --- 163 164 ## Phase 4: Platform Tease (Month 2) 165 166 ### Actions 167 168 1. Add "ARGUS Platform" section to README with waitlist link 169 2. Publish Edition 5: "Why Detection Without Correction Is Just a Dashboard" 170 3. Demo the autonomous correction loop (video, not code) on LinkedIn 171 4. Open GitHub Discussion: "What would you want from autonomous LLM correction?" 172 173 ### Goal 174 175 Convert argus-ai users into ARGUS Platform waitlist sign-ups. The hook is working when developers say "I can see the degradation but I cannot fix it automatically." 176 177 --- 178 179 ## Success Metrics 180 181 | Metric | 30 Days | 90 Days | 180 Days | 182 |--------|---------|---------|----------| 183 | GitHub Stars | 200 | 1,000 | 5,000 | 184 | PyPI Downloads | 500 | 5,000 | 25,000 | 185 | Contributors | 5 | 15 | 40 | 186 | LinkedIn Newsletter Subs | 800 | 1,500 | 3,000 | 187 | HN Points | 100+ | - | - | 188 | Platform Waitlist | - | 200 | 1,000 |