1320c2c54ff40a20be315dc42f80763427408f
1 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] 2 helo=mx.sourceforge.net) 3 by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) 4 (envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1XK6gU-0004NA-AJ 5 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; 6 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:16:18 +0000 7 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com 8 designates 209.85.218.50 as permitted sender) 9 client-ip=209.85.218.50; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; 10 helo=mail-oi0-f50.google.com; 11 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]) 12 by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) 13 (Exim 4.76) id 1XK6gT-0004xE-F0 14 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; 15 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:16:18 +0000 16 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a141so5679946oig.37 17 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; 18 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:16:12 -0700 (PDT) 19 MIME-Version: 1.0 20 X-Received: by 10.182.19.135 with SMTP id f7mr49809332obe.40.1408544171983; 21 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:16:11 -0700 (PDT) 22 Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com 23 Received: by 10.76.97.132 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:16:11 -0700 (PDT) 24 In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJD4W=SX1QEpW-3rcPHVsRRVoXPkjRGRaCsA49SDOAssVw@mail.gmail.com> 25 References: <CAJHLa0NXAYh9HzazN6gArUV8y7J8_G0oqkZqPBgibpW0wRNxKQ@mail.gmail.com> 26 <CA+s+GJDM4Tq69wDv2UQ07aCLDOayA9C8im+O+cJn2dSrVopUmw@mail.gmail.com> 27 <20140820012623.GN22640@nl.grid.coop> 28 <CA+s+GJD4W=SX1QEpW-3rcPHVsRRVoXPkjRGRaCsA49SDOAssVw@mail.gmail.com> 29 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:16:11 +0200 30 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PoxNAtdWefhRrjDaOiVm2lKeBrY 31 Message-ID: <CANEZrP3LUMfNTDa1BUBE6PtCAt2Gd6g+cdt5oprydh643O_G_Q@mail.gmail.com> 32 From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> 33 To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> 34 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c29966058b970501103fb4 35 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) 36 X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. 37 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 38 -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for 39 sender-domain 40 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider 41 (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) 42 -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 43 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 44 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, 45 not necessarily valid 46 -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 47 X-Headers-End: 1XK6gT-0004xE-F0 48 Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> 49 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering github 50 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net 51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 52 Precedence: list 53 List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> 54 List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, 55 <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> 56 List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> 57 List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> 58 List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> 59 List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, 60 <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> 61 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:16:18 -0000 62 63 --001a11c29966058b970501103fb4 64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 65 66 If github were to be abandoned for anything, it'd make sense to move code 67 review and bug tracking elsewhere. GitHub does a reasonably good job of 68 hosting git repositories. It kind of sucks at code review and the issue 69 tracker is rudimentary at best. These days you can do "log in with my 70 github account" so if done well, it'd not have to be very painful. 71 72 JetBrains make great stuff and they have a code review and repository 73 exploration tool called Upsource in development, which should come out 74 soon. I think it's proprietary but that would be no different to github, 75 and it's designed for self hosting. 76 77 --001a11c29966058b970501103fb4 78 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 79 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 80 81 <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">If github were to be abandoned = 82 for anything, it'd make sense to move code review and bug tracking else= 83 where. GitHub does a reasonably good job of hosting git repositories. It ki= 84 nd of sucks at code review and the issue tracker is rudimentary at best. Th= 85 ese days you can do "log in with my github account" so if done we= 86 ll, it'd not have to be very painful.</div> 87 <div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">JetBrains m= 88 ake great stuff and they have a code review and repository exploration tool= 89 called Upsource in development, which should come out soon. I think it'= 90 ;s proprietary but that would be no different to github, and it's desig= 91 ned for self hosting.</div> 92 </div> 93 94 --001a11c29966058b970501103fb4-- 95 96